Editorial policy

This page describes how GadgetClarity is actually made: what our AI tools do, what is checked and by whom, and the rules everything we publish follows.

How we use AI

We use AI tools to research, draft and organise our content. AI agents read manufacturers’ documentation, regulator notices and the independent sources we name, and draft our articles, guides and reviews from them.

Product photos come from the manufacturer. Some images place that photo on a background made by an AI image model or crop it to show a detail, and some illustrations are made entirely with AI image tools. We caption these images to say how they were made.

What is checked before publication

These are drafted with AI and saved as drafts. Since 14 October 2026 none has been published automatically: a person on our team decides whether each draft is published. Each one tells you, at the top, which of the following applies.

• “This article was generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence.” No editor has checked it against its sources. Many pieces published before 14 October 2026 went live without anyone reviewing them first, and they carry this notice.
• “Written with the assistance of artificial intelligence and checked against its sources by…” An editor has verified the facts against the sources and is named, with the date. Correcting grammar or skimming the text does not count as a check, and if the text changes after the check, the first notice comes back until it is checked again.

A piece written by a person without AI drafting carries neither notice.

What we write about

Articles cover developments that matter to someone who owns or is about to buy one of these devices: a launch or a confirmed release date, a firmware or app update that changes what the device can do, a change to a membership plan, a feature arriving in or being withheld from a country, a recall or a regulator decision, a security or privacy finding, and credible independent testing. Practical guides answer one question an owner actually has. We do not publish rumours or leaks unless the manufacturer or a regulator filing confirms them.

Sources

Primary sources come first: the manufacturer's own pages, manuals, help centre, release notes and plan pages, and regulator or standards documents. Independent reporting and testing are used when the source is named and the claim can be traced. When reliable sources disagree, the article explains the disagreement. When something cannot be established, it says so plainly.

What we do not do

We do not test products. Unless a page says otherwise and gives the dates, nobody here has used the product, and our pages never describe an experience we have not had. If you find wording that suggests otherwise, tell us and we will correct it.

We do not invent figures, prices, test results or reader reviews. When the sources disagree or say nothing, the page says so.

Independence

No advertiser, manufacturer, retailer or affiliate partner can pay to change a verdict, a score or what we choose to cover. We do not accept payment for coverage. Commercial content, if there is ever any, will be labelled as such and kept apart from editorial work.

Affiliate links and prices

Price links in reviews are affiliate links. If you buy through one we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. Prices change constantly: we refresh them daily and show a figure only while it is recent, and the price on the retailer's site at checkout is always the authoritative one.

Editorial responsibility

We take editorial responsibility for the content published on this website, including everything produced with AI tools. The site is published by Ciprian Jitaru, whose contact details are in our terms of use. If something we published is wrong, tell us and we will correct it.

Corrections

We get things wrong sometimes. When we do, we fix it promptly and, for anything material, note the change on the page. If you spot an error, please tell us.